Category: Media/PR

  • My Writings and Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala

    yashuaiblogoWhen I wrote an open letter to the Coordinating Minister in Charge of the Economy and Minister of Finance, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, over appointments to some top positions, it was, to me, simply the continuation of an age-old hobby that I developed since my student days in the university. I write with the purest of intentions not to malign anyone. I respect characters in my writings and readers’ views.

    It was through my opinion and feature writings that I won some awards in the university and the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) at state and national levels. Though I deferred an admission offered to me by the University of Nigeria Nsukka to pursue Masters Programme in PR after I was honored with Automatic Scholarship for being the best Writer during the NYSC, I accepted automatic employments by both the Delta State Government and the Federal Government in 1993 and 1994 respectively.

    In my letter of acceptance, I reflected that I would continue to write opinion articles that will be geared towards making Nigeria a better society that every Nigerian will be proud of. My experiences with great Igbos, Itshekiris and Urhobos formed the fulcrum of my early write ups during my youth service and after I started work at the Government House, Asaba. Their leaders, who took me as their son, protected and provided for my needs. Prof. Chike Edozien, the Asagba of Asaba, Chief Paulinus Akpeki and Ugoh of Okpe Kingdom were among some of the great people that made my youth service year and work experience a worthwhile adventure in Delta State.

    When I moved to the Federal Civil Service, I never stopped writing. In fact most of my deployments to different offices were largely influenced by my enthusiasm for generating news items, issuing press releases and producing well-informed features stories.

    As a Nigerian and a public official, I have always been conscious of my responsibility to ensure that the general public perceives government in a good light. I have strived to be a good ambassador of the government and people of Nigeria. I performed my roles with the best of intentions.

    My writings can be divided into two major categories: official and unofficial. A careful perusal of my writings in the media will show that I sign the first category in my capacity as information/PR officer of the different places that I have been posted to. In the second category, I have been careful to make it clear that I write in my personal capacity as a private citizen. To make that point even clearer I affix my personal home address or email to personal opinions.

    Since my employment, I have published books, issued over 2000 news releases, wrote news features and personal opinion, all in my bid to promote the activities of government and contribute to the peaceful coexistence of the diverse groups in the country. Most of my writings are accessible on my blog: www.yashuaib.com.

    The recent article, which generated a lot of reactions and comments, was not done to malign anyone. Incidentally, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala is a personality I have a lot of admiration and respect for. I believe that she is aware of this. And so, when I put pen to paper in what has become routine to me to express my viewpoints on some recent appointments into top positions in her ministry, I never expected that it would be perceived negatively. It was to draw her attention to the strong speculations making the rounds which, in my view, she is not only capable of addressing but would do well to be aware of.

    Maybe I should add here that during the President Olusegun Obasanjo administration in which Dr. Okonjo-Iweala was also an influential member, I wrote some critical opinion articles on the activities of the president, Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Nasir el-Rufai, Mrs. Oby Ekwesili, and Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), among others. During the short-lived administration of President Umaru Yar’Adua, I x-rayed some of the president’s policies and those of Segun Adeniyi, his spokesman. I even wrote critical commentaries on my supervising Minister then, Mr. John Odey, who on some occasions, publicly responded to and addressed some of the my issues raised in my write-ups. As late as 2012, I wrote an article on President Goodluck Jonathan with the title “Flood in the Eyes of the President” and it was published in most national dailies. Following this, I received words of encouragement even from some of his aides and was consequently requested to support my postulations with photographs.

    The Director General of the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), Muhammad Sani-Sidi, who had intervened several times to resolve the current issue with Madam Minister, is one of the bosses that have tolerated my critical opinions on various issues. We disagree and later agree on issues like normal human beings do.

    In essence, encouraging responses that I have received in the past have served as the impetus for me to continue with my cherished hobby. To me, I am simply contributing to the betterment of our country. It was in view of the above, therefore, that I was encouraged to pen the open letter to the Finance Minister on some developments, which I strongly believe she has the capacity to address.

    I was initially elated when I received a telephone call from the Minister on Wednesday March 20, 2013 at 6.15pm. Naturally, I was happy that, once again, my effort has yielded fruit. Receiving a call from someone that a reputable international news organization described as one of the most influential women on earth is humbling. I felt jubilant when I heard “Shuaibu, this is Okonjo-Iweala!” However, when she added “Why should you do this to me? You can’t praise me and condemn me and call it constructive criticism. Haba Shuaibu!” I knew that my opinion had not been viewed positively.

    Despite the huge difference in age and status, the Minister took her time to explain to me why so much of what I concluded was not the case. During the conversation, the Minister even read portions of my write-up.

    While feeling flattered and honored that a world-class technocrat like the minister was humble enough to personally call me and explain her position to me, I couldn’t help wondering why this particular piece attract such concerns and why so much more meaning than I intended has been read to it.

    To me, the article was as harmless as every other that I had written in the past. I was still contemplating how to tackle the seeming complications when just a few days afterwards, hate comments and rejoinders pointing out that my article had been inspired by ethnic and religious considerations began to appear in newspapers and Nigerian online forums.

    I want to emphasise, once again, that my article was written with the purest of intentions, and even a cursory internet search will reveal that I have done this religiously in the last 20 years. Contrary to insinuations of ethnocentrism, sectionalism and sponsorship in many of the reactions and rejoinders to the opinion, I take full responsibility for the views that were expressed. I have never written with, or caused articles to be published with malice. I am a strong believer in the oneness and potentials of this country, and most of my opinions have been centred on great Nigerians that I admire and will not want to see fall into disrepute.

    Despite this, however, I have realised that the said opinion has caused great discomfort to some individuals and groups. I want to reassure my elders and my good brothers and sisters, especially from a section of the country, who might have felt offended by my write-up that I harbor no grudge against them. I will not like to see this discomfort and the continuation of unnecessary hate comments. After all, we are one big family.

    Yushau A. Shuaib
    www.yashuaib.com

  • Convergence of Spokespersons in Government

    Spokespersons of Critical MDA after Inaugural meeting in CBN Hq Abuja

    By Yushau A. Shuaib

    The occasion was auspicious. The personalities were news-creators from diverse critical government ministries, department and agencies (MDAs) and the host is the Embassy of the United States of America in Nigeria.

    The 24 selected spokespersons of critical MDAs in Nigeria represented security agencies, financial institutions and regulatory bodies who were invited to a Four-Day Spokespersons Training Workshop organised by the Public Affairs Section of the embassy in collaboration with Washington-based Edel Communication.

    In his address to the plenary session, US Ambassador to Nigeria, Terence P. McCulley told the participants that as spokespersons of their organisations, they play an important role in the success of democracy. According to him “Spokespersons help shape public debates and perceptions, and are central to the system of communicating with the people.”

    The Ambassador therefore encouraged the spokespersons to participate actively in the training because it would help them learn how to enhance their relationship with the media, how to inform citizens in a clear and timely manner, and demonstrate how the government is addressing people’s needs.

    The guest speaker and resource person is Christian Edel, a renowned U.S. media consultant and president of Washington-based Edel Communications. He is one of the best instructors in Public Communication Strategies, and has trained ministers and government spokespersons from more than 60 countries including government representatives in Mexico, Tanzania, South Africa, Turkey, Ukraine, and Lebanon. In the United States, he is credited with the training of thousands of U.S. State Department employees, including assistant secretaries of state, ambassadors, and other diplomats.

    The participants went through hands-on practical training consisting of on-camera practice along with critiques in which a group of eight participants each day worked together in pairs of two, all receiving individual attention from the trainer and peers. Participants were overwhelmed and excited by the practical training executed with sophisticated equipment, especially the simulating scenario in a live-broadcast environment. Despite their long years of experience, most participants admitted that they had learned new skills in using latest technologies to reach mass audience.

    The participants were taken through various theoretical and practical techniques of public communication in a competitive and even hostile environment. Writing skills and the use of different form of media- print, electronic and online were also part of the workshop. The sessions and outcomes of the programme were very instructive, timely and beneficial for improvement in professional competence of officers.

    A major revelation of the summit was the realization that spokespersons in government hardly meet to chart a course through cooperation and collaboration for unified communication strategies to propagate policies and programmes.

    Though it was discovered that the Federal Ministry of Information has an online forum for Resident Information Officers for circulation of press releases and features, the platform is restricted to staffs of the ministry on secondment to other agencies. It was also noted that PRNigeria online, which has been in existence for a while is only an informative portal and resources centre for result development in communication and public relations practice.

    It was generally agreed that none of the existing platforms provide an avenue for interaction in a convivial environment where spokespersons of public institutions could synergize and cooperate towards unified communication agenda in enhancing public communication for the success of the administration.

    It was in view of this that the participants suggested the formation of a Forum for Spokespersons in Government as a common public communications platform. In a deliberate effort to concretise the vision of the forum towards identifying new and creative ways to promote a coherent image of the institutions of government, the Director of Communication at Central Bank, Mr. Ogochukwu Okorafor hosted the participants to a special lunch where Col. Muhammad Yerima, Director, Defence Information was elected Chairman with Okorafor as deputy while Kachi Daju of Federal Ministry of Information would serve as Secretary to steer the activities of the forum.

    At the CBN- hosted special lunch, members agreed that the forum should comprise Chief Press Secretaries, Head of Press and Public Relations and Directors of Corporate Communications representing public institutions from ministries, departments, commissions, agencies among others. The forum they added should serve as a mechanism for inter-agency cooperation and coordination in the field of public information and communications. The forum will also strive to strengthen inter-agency cooperation for enhanced objective and fair media profile of government institutions.

    It is expected that the spokespersons’ knowledge of the media and key mandates of their respective  institutions can enhance and promote better understanding of government policies in a well-coordinated and unified communication processes.

    While more spokespersons from critical MDAs have signified their intention to join the forum, the output of the group will determine their substance and influence in re-shaping public opinions about institutions of government from seeming negative perception to positive image.

  • When PR and Media People Meet on Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)

    Most times public relations people meet with their regular stakeholders, the media representatives to brief them about new developments or to respond to media enquiry. But on this special occasion, it is neither for press briefing nor on media enquiry. It is an occasion for interaction on how to cement relationship between the news hunters and image merchants. And guess the issue: DISASTERS.
    The event was held in Geneva, Switzerland with some side attractions for selected spokespersons of response agencies and as well as journalists covering disaster issues from some countries. The programme has a theme “Towards a new approach to disasters from consequences to causes.” It was co-sponsored by the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), together with the support of the Thomson Reuters Foundation and the European Commission’s Directorate General Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection.

    The venue is the International Conference Centre, Geneva where the Third Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction is taking place. This segment of the programme was to train about 40 media and national platform representatives from Africa and Middle East Countries. Luckily Nigeria is also represented.

    From the outset, the spokesperson of UNISDR, Brigitte Leoni while welcoming the participants who came from various countries said that national media organizations play an important role in promoting national disaster risk reduction (DRR) policies and programmes. According to her “to do so, however, they need to know what disaster risk reduction is about and to have established contacts with key DRR professionals who can provide them with accurate and timely information. At the same time, National Platform representatives need to be trained on how to better promote disaster risk reduction issues through the media at the national level.”

    On the other hand Margareta Wahlström, Assistant Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction and Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction and head UNISDR urged the participants to play their roles in reducing the risk in disasters. She said the danger of inaction on the part of policy makers as well as those that could spread the information on DRR would be worst on our communities.

    Richard Meares with wide experience from Reuters anchored the sessions where information officers and the journalists spoke frankly with sincerity about the seeming frosty relationship between them when it comes to information gathering and dissemination. While we discussed and deliberated on what constitute news and how the relationship should be defined, there were unclear issues on how best to influence not manipulate media reporting. Ethical issues were also raised but answer to the real question could not be answer. The question is why should media ignore most stories from organisations’ perspective? Must organisation cough out monetary resources in the name of adverts to get public adequately informed on potential hazards?

    YAShuaib with Margareta Wahlstrom Head of UNISDR (DRR) and Yahya Jafee of Palestian TV

    As a participant, I can say that it is quite exciting to have highly skilled resource persons as well as speakers addressing us on various topics from media coverage, media relations, crisis management and the new thinking on Disaster Risk Reduction.

    As a participant I have healthy interaction, mutual exchange of experiences and expertise with other participants during the programme. We also have the additional opportunity of attending the Third Global Platform on Disaster Risk Reduction which was meant for high level delegations from multilateral, multinational organisations and government institutions across the globe.

    The United Nations Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon, after declaring the main conference open, also addressed us at a Press Conference with other journalists that came to cover the Conference.

    Other side attraction was the launching of a guide for journalists covering disaster risk reduction by Tim Sebastian of British Broadcasting Corporation who encourage every journalist or PR person to have the book. It is indeed must-read book. Because I still enjoy reading it now.

    The most touching moment was when Ban Ki-moon disclosed that: “This conference’s aim is to reduce risk of disasters, through technology, knowledge and economic tools. But for many of us, this mission is also deeply personal. The United Nations is the global first responder to disasters and crises.

    “As Secretary-General, I have seen the devastation of Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar, the destruction from the epic floods in Pakistan…the horrific impact of earthquakes in Haiti, Western China and Chile. I have looked in the eyes of those who have lost loved ones. I have listened to those who have seen the world they know disappear in a flash. And I have struggled to answer their simple, one-word question: Why? Just recently I was in Chernobyl, Ukraine. The hand of man was responsible for that catastrophe twenty-five years ago. But the earthquake and tsunami in Japan gave us the disaster in Fukushima with all its echoes of Chernobyl and a grave warning to the future.

    “As we have learned again and again, no country or city – rich or poor — is immune.”

    YAShuaib with other participants at Media/PR workshop in Geneva on DRR

    While I observe that most of the discussions centred on natural disasters, there are some countries that are so blessed and have never witnessed or recorded such natural catastrophes yet the dangerous antics of undesirable elements as well as ineptitude leadership in such nations are major resons for unwarranted human-induced disasters like wars, conflicts and diseases.

    We must invest wisely today for better future through public awareness and empowerment of the people. The job is for all of us the journalists, PR people and all human. Disaster risk reduction is everyone’s business.

  • The PR Crisis of NNPC indebtedness

    Babalola, Finance Minister of State
    The best story tellers for news media could be found among public relations practitioners who are creative in generating newsworthiness from events and statements that could even be inconsequential or belated. Most cover stories and exclusive reports have the imprint of those hidden publicity persuaders whose identities are frequently shrouded in anonymity. They are the ‘impeccable insiders’ and ‘reliable sources’ without by-lines.

    Not that the media could not have their ways in getting stories, they use the PR sources to authenticate and validate their reports. While some of those image makers have succeeded in enhancing the profiles of their bosses as well as their organisations, others, due to slight misgivings become sacrificial lambs that are crucified and banished from their beats.

    There is currently an intense controversy over a seeming harmless piece of news that has some elements of PR on the insolvency of Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) which put a top public officer and even the federal government in an embarrassing situation.

    The man in the storm is Remi Babalola, the Finance Minister of State who is also Chairman of the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC). A young man in the cabinet, who has remained in that position serving under three full ministers in the Finance Ministry: Dr. Shamsudeen Usman, Dr. Mansur Mukhtar and now the current minister Dr. Olusegun Aganga. He only had a brief stint as Acting Minister of the Federal Capital Territory while late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua was alive.

    Babalola has vibrant and efficient PR teams who crafts and flashes his actions and utterances to make lead stories. The strategy of the team led by Oluyinka Akintunde, an award winning investigative reporter succeeded in ensuring that their principal is recognised as spokesperson of the administration on economic and financial matters. The team uses all new media techniques, not only via email and text messages, to ensure press releases, features, pictures and exclusive backgrounders are picked by newshounds.

    While other Ministers of State, play second fiddle, the publicity campaigns make Babalola to be outspoken, independent and visible in his portfolio. Not that his senior colleagues are not doing anything, they may be too busy working behind the scene to address policy issues. He seemed to be enjoying their full confidence until the recent PR statement that went awry.

    His dilemma started at the FAAC meeting in July 2010, when he disclosed that President Goodluck Jonathan had directed the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) to henceforth generate monthly oil production statistics for reconciliation in the second month after the month of data gathering. The directive became necessary to address the problem of recoveries for overpayment and underpayment to State from the 13 per cent derivation computation.

    He then went further in the statement to confirm that NNPC had written the Ministry of Finance to explain that it was experiencing financial difficulties as a result of the disequilibrium between costs and cash inflow streams. The NNPC, according to him also requested for a reimbursement of N1.156 trillion from Ministry of Finance in order to repay its debt of N450 billion to the Federation Account.

    Immediately after the statement, which as customary was timely issued by the PR team, the first reaction strangely came from NNPC Spokesperson Dr. Levi Ajuonuma who is always cautious in issuing rejoinders chose his word appropriate declaring that the corporation could not be classified as insolvent when it had a healthy cash flow and could pay for its crude and product importation obligations. He further claimed that NNPC was being owed N1.156 trillion naira by the government as a result of petroleum subsidies which if reimbursed would enable the NNPC to offset the N450 billion naira debt being owed the FAAC.

    After weekly Ministerial meeting, like a cowed bull, Remi was led and chastised before the media at a Press Conference in the Presidential Villa, where Minister of Information, Professor Dora Akunyili lambasted his claim saying that it did not reflect the true position of the Corporation and that “NNPC is not insolvent. Given the nature of NNPC, there are regular transactions between the Government and NNPC and as a result there are always outstanding balances between them.”

    The new Finance Minister, Dr. Aganga then joined in the rebuke by stating that “We have so many different transactions between the NNPC and the Federal Government, in some form of the balances it maybe a daily balance and in another it may be a trade balance. You need to make all of these things up, if you are worried about NNPC that is a different matter”.

    In a twist with contradictory disclosure, few weeks after, an independent body, the Nigeria Extractive Industry Initiative (NEITI) reconfirmed that NNPC owes federation account N654 billion and threatened to sanction oil and gas companies that fail to remit oil revenue and taxes to the federation account as recommended by the 2005 industry audit. The Executive Secretary of agency Mallam Haruna Yunusa Sa’eed said the NNPC is yet to remit some of the money discovered in the 2005 audit and is among the top debtors of the federation account. Chairman of the NEITI, Professor Assisi Asobie re-echoed the same position, promising to lodge complaints to appropriate authorities on the oil companies that refuse to comply with NEITI’s Act for appropriate sanction.

    Looking at the facts and dramas, one may wonder what actually put Remi Babalola, a former Executive Director in some of big banks into trouble? Is Remi Babalola growing wings and undermining his superiors in government? Is he an overzealous publicity freak who would rather seek media limelight than engage in government business without attracting attention? Or could he be playing to the gallery with hidden agenda, typical of politicians, for immediate or future ambitions?

    The fact is that the position of minister of state is not recognised in the Constitution. In most cases they take orders from full minister who earns high salaries. They are more like directors in Ministries. Special Advisers with designated portfolios are often more powerful and influential than Ministers of State.

    The unnecessary imbroglio, a national shame and PR crisis could have been averted through consultations in the spirit of team work. Some may argue that the young minister was taught the hard lesson to check his outspokenness and visibility from taking shine off his senior colleagues.

    The PR team should now realise that they need to thread softly especially on a position whose tenure is not constitutionally guaranteed from arbitrary removal. Had it been that the office is typical of independent and autonomous bodies like RMAFC, CBN and INEC, one would have expected an exciting fire-for-fire that could be laced with propaganda. There is no crime in being very efficient in PR campaign, but definitely something could be wrong by overdoing it, especially in a system where there are other players seeking recognitions.

    The article by Yushau A. Shuaib appeared originally in August 2010 in the following print media: Economic Confidential, New Nigerian, Daily Trust, Tribune, Vanguard, Punch, Thisday, People Daily July, The Sun and Leadership and Champion.

  • Online Propaganda and Social Media

    Social-Media

    The battle ground has shifted. In an advanced society conflict is no longer resolved through the use of bows and arrows. This crude method of conflict resolution can only be found in archaic societies, for instance the Jos crisis in Northern Nigeria where victims were cut to death with machetes. Wars have also gone beyond the deployment of guns, missiles and the Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD) – a claim for the justification of George Bush and Tony Blair’s arbitrary invasion of Iraq.

    The new war is fought without shedding human blood. The social media is the battle ground for the interested parties where online propaganda plays prominent roles. Social media is used for advocacy and mobilisation for noble causes and on the other hand to blackmail and destroy individual and institutional reputations. One can read, listen and video live happening across the globe provided, not only by the media but the ordinary persons on the street and shared on the internet.

    The emergence of the internet has brought about a range of auxiliaries to enhance communication amongst individuals and groups from the development of website, email and instant messaging. The great innovation of the decade is the social media network which has elevated human communication and activities to an exciting and scary level. The major applications and tools for social media include online forums, blogs, microblogs, social networks, bookmarking sites, online videos, podcasting and Instant Messages. The popular brands of those tools include Facebook, Myspace, Youtube, Twitter, Delicious, Digg, stumbleupon and various others.

    The technology has revolutionized the way we communicate, interact and play – without the need for third parties except the gadgets. One does not need to expend too much resources to read newspapers, watch TV, listen to radio, play games and with spontaneous platforms for online reactions. Business transactions, like online shopping and banking are conducted round the clock without stepping out our homes. Most of the developers of these technologies actually transform their ideas to reality from the comfort of their homes.

    The success of Obama’s election was largely associated with effective use of social media technology, likewise the massive global supports received by victims of Haitian earthquake. Access to computers and mobile devices has indeed made the world a global village.

    As exciting as these new media applications are, their impact on our lives as users, the economic improvements in the lives of the technology developers and technicians, it still calls for great concerns to humanity. The rate of divorce is increasing due to cheating on social media as unfaithful partners are easily tracked, just as professional hackers are having field day discrediting security systems of established institutions, while fraudsters milk their victims dry through tempting baits on the internet. Frustrated souls too, especially amongst youngsters now find the convenience of committing suicide through advisory from some social websites.

    While social media encourages human laziness and physical social interactions, a new finding in Britain reports that the negative effect of video game and social networking websites which is blamed for the shocking rise in rickets amongst children. A freely distributed Metro newspaper, reports that spending hours in front of a computer means youngsters do not stay outdoors enough, hence, they suffer lack of vitamin D which can lead to rickets that was once associated with poverty. Kids now stay indoors more these days and play their computers instead of enjoying the natural fresh air.

    As the traditional providers of those services are already in real economic recession, a massive job cut has become the order of the day as the computer provides all manner of service that were once provided by man.

    The real bad news is that the next World War will not be fought with conventional armaments, but through the social media. The social media has uplifted propaganda, another tool of public relations to another level. Even in Nigeria, a country notorious for sectional infighting, parties in conflicts are using online platform to promote themselves and destroyed their opponents with malicious and some libellous campaigns, yet backed with evidences. A video of arbitrary execution of innocent citizens where uploaded on the website, with each sectional claiming to be the victims of the assault.

    The Chinese government recently through its authoritative and Independent newspaper, People’s Daily raises a concern about the manipulation of social media for propaganda by other countries that pretend to promote freedom of information. The Editorial of the paper accused America for using “cyber army” to engage in online warfare, by fomenting civil unrest in the Islamic Republic of Iran after the June 12 election in that country last year. The paper said: “America was exploiting social media such as Twitter and YouTube to generate protests against the Iranian regime.

    It went further to say that “Behind what America calls free speech is naked political scheming. How did the unrest after the Iranian elections come about? It was because of online warfare launched by America, via YouTube video and Twitter, microblogging, spread rumours, created splits, stirred up, and sowed discord between the followers of conservative reformist factions.”

    The Asian publication also raised the fear being expressed by other countries on what constitute freedom of information and democratisation by stating that: “We’re afraid that in the eyes of American politicians, only information controlled by America is free information, only news acknowledged by America is free news, only speech approved by America is free speech, and only information flow that suits American interests is free information flow.”

    In the fear that the social media seems to be going out of control, some actions are being taken in some societies to deny access to selected websites. Some countries like China have blocked access to some websites; these include the popular YouTube, Twitter and Facebook to control so-called cultural imperialism.

    At individual level, a company in United States has developed software that can permanently kill access to the social websites at the click of the button. The company sees its innovation as a relief and rehabilitation for addicts who want to detach the excessive addiction to the technology. The killer software called Web 2.0 Suicide Machine is an ingenious package that sluices online presence permanently from social networks. The service has received massive subscription to the disadvantage of favourite social websites.

    The question is why should internet users and the general public becoming wary of social media? The technology is yet to have moral standard and code of ethic. It is not easily controlled or regulated as some anonymous users have notoriety of wrecking havoc before speedy actions and authentication are made.

    While scholars in communication and Public Relations (PR) continue to extol the virtue of social media as an undoubted tool for effective communication and human development, it requires some levels of control against criminal tendencies, untoward behaviours and manipulation by some users towards a saner global community. For now we may welcome the online propaganda than physical combatants by parties in disputes.

    This article by Yushau A. Shuaib was originally published in Economic confidential February, The Guardian February 8, Daily Trust February 9, People Daily February 10, Vanguard February 11, New Nigerian February 12, National Life February 13, Sunday Tribune February 14 and Daily Champion February 15, 2010

    Please check out this youtube downloader that can make youtube to mp3. It is also a youtube converter mp3 like yt convert. It is free and useful.

  • CBN Governor and PR Approach

    Sanusi Lamido of CBN
    There is fear, tension and anxiety in the land not necessary on the action of the new governor of Central Bank of Nigeria, Mr. Sanusi Lamido Sanusi but on his pronouncements and reactions on the reconsolidation of the banking system.

    The Governor’s action in sacking former chief executive officers of the five Nigerian banks that were allegedly engaged in unethical practices has been hailed by Nigerians who are either victims or have been suspicious of activities in that sector especially on their incredible, most times manipulated annual financial reports and the misuse of their female officers who are forced to indecently dress, so as to entice customers to their banks. Many businesses have collapsed due to the failure of the banks to provide facilities for growing enterprises and the real sectors of the economy.

    Some people may attach ethnic sentiments to the cleansing exercise being conducted by Sanusi Lamido in the banking sector, I only wish they know ass an intellectual that has written and spoken without fear on various contemporary issues including politics, religion, governance, cultural diversity, economy among others. His writings as a public commentator are public knowledge, especially where he castigated and blamed Northern elites for the North’s backwardness due to their arrogance, selfishness and nonchalant attitudes to the plight of their people. Probably if not for his present position, Sanusi’s opinion would have been sought on the Boko Haram Crisis in Maiduguri Borno State.

    Sanusi could not be accused of incompetence because so far nobody doubts his professional integrity and incorruptibility, not even the maverick billionaire, Barrister Jimoh Ibrahim who attests to Sanusi’s credibility but yet attacks the CBN for listing him amongst the bad debtors.

    The fear I have for Sanusi is that he is behaving typical of his close friends: Nasiru El-rufai and Nuhu Ribadu, the former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and Chairman of the economic and financial crimes Commission (EFCC) respectively who do not give a hoot in their public pronouncement and comments once they are fully convinced, when positive actions should speak louder than mere utterances.

    Let us critically examine this issue; should a top public officer of his status be entitled to expressing his personal opinions and convictions publicly? Shouldn’t there be limit to the comments and observation make by top public office holders? Must top public office holders respond to every comments, observations and views expressed by the public? How often must such officer appear or relate directly with the public in order to pass information?

    This piece tries to examine the Governor of CBN’s approach in the context of public relations whose principle is to sincerely and truthfully communicate towards establishing mutual and beneficial relationship amongst the stakeholders as well as create public awareness on issues that border on the organisation and the public.

    During his maiden media briefing with the Press, the governor told his audience that he would only appear occasionally, probably after the monthly meeting of Monetary Policy Committee to brief them on new developments on economic and monetary issues, while his lieutenants that include the deputy governors and directors would address the public on their respective schedules. But the situations since then indicate that he does most of the talking.

    I must admit that the new Governor of CBN is very sincere in his disposition so far in an attempt to revive and restore the image of Nigerian banks. But the reality is that he is too ethical, hasty and blunt in his approach which requires caution in utterances, vigilance in association and full alertness to unfolding events that may guide his actions.

    Most of his media friends and even those who manage his public affairs may find it difficult to admit that the governor need to relax on the frequency of his direct interaction with the public. There is nothing wrong with occasional public appearances if only to make pronouncement on new development. The responsibility to reinforce position and clear the airs on misinformation and misconception are handled by other reliable and knowledgeable managers, most especially officially designated spokespersons who are the professionals in processing public perception and reputation management. The spokespersons take charge in monitoring and processing the impacts as well as take full responsibility for feedbacks and rejoinders.

    In Public relations one does not need to play to the gallery in confronting problems with half-baked truth or blatant lies like in propaganda or brainwashing in the name rebranding, some restraint are essential to gauge the public moods after a major bombshell.

    Every boss, to some extent is an embodiment of the organisation as a social personality over whom media attention may revolve, it is imperative that delegation of responsibility and public appearances for media attention is controlled to avoid unnecessary distractions.

    He should allow the new chief executives of the banks and other relevant regulatory institutions to give endorsement to the new monetary directions as they continue to monitor the trends of event in the financial systems. He should also count on his network of friends among the publishers, civil society groups and academia because only mischief makers and ethnic jingoist would read negative meanings to the actions taken so far.

    He is knowledgeable no doubt, but should be courteous and diplomatic in his relationship with other stakeholders, because some media reports portray him like a combatant ready for confrontations instead of an umpire that should create enabling environment. He should not be seen as a competitor but rather the regulator towards stabilisation of the polity for economic development.

    He may not know but fifth columnists exist, watching every move and can strike and stab. Sanusi therefore need to be knowledgeable on survivalist’s instincts’ and mechanisms in his new organisation and the larger society. He should therefore have his ears to the ground and ensure that he monitors the media for feedbacks which may possible require his attention. He should be receptive to good ideas and constructive criticisms to enable him take rational decisions in protecting his image and that of his organisation and Nigeria as a country.

    I may not conclude this without restating that all chief executive officers, including the new Governor of CBN must imbibe the characteristics of public relations person. They should possess the best of character within and outside the working environment. They can be eloquent with prowess of oratory, they need to have control over temperament in the face of tension and provocation. Every human being has his strength and weakness. Nobody is born a perfectionist and, therefore, one needs to have regular self-appraisal to meet public expectations.

    I cherish top public officers who absorb shocks and insults and carry on unperturbed still doing what they intend to do, which is one of the great qualities of General Olusegun Obasanjo during his reign as civilian president. That natural shock-absorber, though rare amongst officers, if positively deployed, is a gift necessary in confronting and surmounting difficulties and should be cultivated and built upon by our bosses.

    This article by Yushau A. Shuaib was originally published in Economic Confidential September, New Nigerian September 7, Leadership September 8, Thisday September 12, Nigerian Tribune September 13, The Guardian September 14, 2009

  • Information Management: Between Odey and Akunyili

    Dora Akunyili
    Sometimes in 2002, NAFDAC officials closed down Biomedical Service, a popular pharmaceutical company in the production of Travenous Fluids in Nigeria. The owner of the firm, Dr. Faruk Abdulazeez, who was an influential politician, believed strongly that the action of NAFDAC was based on wrong assumptions. Fully convinced that his firm had done nothing wrong in its operation and the need to allay the fear of the public who might have received wrong signals on the company over the closure, he decided to go to press.

    Some media experts including former NUJ Chairman, now Senator Adeyemi Smart pointedly advised Dr. Abdulazeez not to engage Akunyili and NAFDAC in media war. Everybody even at that time believed that Akunyili had carved a niche for herself and earned tremendous goodwill from the press. Though a Press Conference was held by Biomedical Service, it only appealed for reasoning and reassessment of its products. With further consultation, the case was revisited and the company was reopened.

    The appointment of Prof. Dora Akunyili a pharmacist as Minister of Information should not have been a surprise considering the fact that Federal Ministry of Information has been a haven for non-professional as its ministers. Most of the ministers appointed in the past have no background knowledge and qualification in mass-communication, journalism or Public Relations practices to be quite relevant. Other sensitive ministries like that of justice, health, finance, science and technology have always had relevant professionals with requisite qualification as ministers. Since the reemergence of democratic dispensation in 1999 some of the past ministers of Federal Ministry of Information were Emeka Chikelu, a lawyer; Frank Nweke Jnr., a zoologist and John Odey a banker by qualifications.

    The media and PR practitioners do seem not to bother about the qualifications of the minister of information. At the national level, the Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE) and Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) have all spoken to support the emergence of Prof. Akunyili as Minister of Information and Communication. The Nigerian Institute of Public Relations (NIPR) is yet to do so publicly but in the online forum for Public Relations practitioners in Nigeria www.prnigeria.net, 60% of respondents said they agreed with her appointment, 26% ticked totally wrong while 13% just said NO.

    Interestingly, Prof. Dora Akunyili like her predecessor in the Federal Ministry of Information and Communication, John Odey, have through regular interactions with the media courted their respect and understanding, most especially editors and respective beat correspondents. From practical experience they know how to woo the media and sustain working relationships.

    As much as PDP under Obasanjo was receiving the bashing towards the tail end of the administration, as the then spokesperson of the party, John Odey’s integrity and professional acumen in dealing with the press was not in doubt. Information management is not necessarily speaking out to be heard but also strategizing silently and quietly in ensuring that negative information that create bad impression are controlled.
    This writer had a close working relationship with John Odey where he observed how he related and managed government’s information. For instance, Odey doesn’t take offence on constructive criticisms where practical solutions are proffered. Without restraint, he gives out his telephone and email addresses and responded to enquiries mostly to text messages. Where necessary, he arranged appointments to clear the air on government policies.
    It may interest the public to note that John Odey belongs to some online forums, including those for Resident Information Officers (Press Secretaries) and Public Relations in Nigeria where members and even his staff do take on him or disagree on issues. He often reacted maturely and positively to the reasons adduced and on several occasions he ensured the issues were squarely addressed.

    I think the communication side of the ministry which deals with telecommunication service and its regulatory environment overwhelmed his portfolio as he had to take some decisive and responsive actions, especially on controversial issues of NITEL towards reviving our collective patrimony. Another area where many had expected John Odey to speak publicly as Minister of Information was on the purported ill-health of President Yar’Adua when the latter was in Saudi Arabia. Odey and Presidential Spokesperson, Segun Adeniyi maintained a dignified silence to avoid sending wrong signals to the public.

    One of the strategies effectively adopted by John Odey in his brief stint as Minister of Information was the weekly Press Briefing he addressed after each meeting of the Federal Executive Council in Presidential Villa. The avenue afforded him the opportunity to highlight positive developments, new directions of government and also using it occasionally to correct misgiving in the polity. While no human is ever infallible, John Odey may have had his weaknesses but he was never arrogant or vindictive as he tried to carry everyone along even against political and bureaucratic considerations.

    He couldn’t make much noise because in every organization whether public or private, the ultimate boss dictates the tune. Probably that was the reason he was not as loud and garrulous as past ministers in similar positions.

    There is no doubt, Professor Akunyili will prove her worth in the new terrain considering the overwhelming support she has so far received from different angle and surprisingly from media and public relations practitioners.

    In the area of practical media relations, she may have no problems. Her success and global recognition as a non-nonsense anti-fake drug crusader when she was the boss at NAFDAC were largely influenced by the tremendous support and encouragement of the Nigeria’s media who promoted and protected her positions. Probably it is in recognition of her goodwill with the press that President Musa Yar’Adua posted her to Ministry of Information.

    I believe Prof. Dora Akunyili can facilitate, through tactical lobbying, the quick passage of Freedom of Information Bill with the National Assembly. She Should also ensure that Nigeria Press Council as the regulator of the press in Nigeria, perform its statutory responsibilities diligently and fearlessly like NAFDAC by monitoring unethical and unprofessional conducts of some media outfits in their reportage and editorials.

    To sanitize the profession of journalism and public relations practice in Nigeria, she should support the efforts of NUJ and NIPR in ensuring that those that practice these sensitive professions have acquired basic training and qualifications. She can do that as she did with certifications of products and practitioners in Food and Drug industry in Nigeria as NAFDAC’s boss.

    While we welcome the new minister to new social and political terrain of information dissemination, she must be reminded that some actions may require different approaches: diplomacy, patience, endurance, decisiveness, courage and sincerity of purpose or one can easily lose all the past glories and respects earned over the years.

    If she intends to play safe from going against her major constituency which is now the media, is better she concentrate her energy on the communications’ aspect of the ministry which deal with telecom operators and their incredible services of late. That is where there is business without politics of what-to-say and not-to-say.

    This article by Yushau A. Shuaib was originally published in Economic Confidential January, New Nigerian January 8, Daily Trust January 8, Sunday Tribune January 11, Daily Sun January 12, Triumph January 14, Thisday January 18, Guardian January 19 and Leadership January 21, 2009

  • Ribadu: The Battle of Spin Doctors

    Nuhu Ribadu of EFCC
    Spin doctor is a slang which describes a person who publicizes favorable interpretations of the words and actions of a public figure, especially a politician. Surprisingly public relations persons object to being described as such because they believe the phrase has derogatory connotation and is more appropriate for those who specialize in turning black to white and vice versa. However as could be observed from commentaries over the redeployment saga of Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crime Commission, EFCC, almost all major opinion molders including the media, clerics, scholars, lawyers, activists amongst others have engaged in spinning to either eulogize or castigate the parties in the brouhaha over the man’s redeployment for capacity building at the prestigious National Institute of Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS) in Jos Plateau State. Everyone seems to be an unsolicited spin doctor for the parties involved.

    On the other hand, the professional spin doctors use the media anonymously to divulge sensitive information or reckless insinuations, to cast aspersion on presumed opponents while portraying their principals in favorable spotlight in the battle of wits. Since the case involves security and intelligence, the attempts by the so-called reliable sources to hide their identities are efforts in futility. In this age of advanced technology, editors and spokespersons must be aware that telephone lines and messages are easily tapped and intercepted for various purposes.

    The most unfortunate scenario staring us on the face as a nation is the politicization and personalization of the redeployment which, mind you, is not removal. The painful irony is the angle it is taking: EFCC vs the Government or Nuhu Ribadu vs President Yar’Adua. Definitely the uproar has given the nation, not only the leaders a bad image. Why should we go through this unnecessary bickering which overheats the system in the New Year? In fact some have gone to the extreme to question any achievement of the new administration and read ulterior motives on its professed seven point agenda insinuating as well that the rule of law slogan is used as a smokescreen to protect corruption. The situation took a frightening dimension when international community and foreigners were dabbling into a purely internal affair.

    There is no doubt that Ribadu was able to court the goodwill of the public, especially the media by his receptiveness to their enquiries and for daring the untouchables. He therefore deserved all the solidarity, taking into cognizance that as human he has obvious shortcomings which explains the alleged selectivity in the choice of his preys. EFCC as anti-corruption agency, under him undoubtedly performed exceedingly well in raising the consciousness of Nigerians on the ills of corruption. It is a memorable legacy that within a short time he established a well-organised institution where staffs are provided realistic welfare package to dissuade them from corrupt practices and even set up a well-equipped training institute.

    It is instructive that most of the officers in EFCC that create a perception of incorruptibility, are not from the moon but products of our same much vilified Nigerian Police on secondment. It is quite a case of black pot producing white pap even if they are righteous converts of late. In the first instance there could not have been a necessity for the creation of ICPC and EFCC if the police had not failed in their responsibilities in crime prevention and protection of life and property. The two anti-corruption agencies should have been departments under the police force. EFCC is a clear lesson that with political will we can make radical transformation. Were Ribadu and his team typical consultants who are entitled to commissions for recovery of funds, from what they have recovered so far, definitely they could have been a new generation of billionaires without cutting corners.

    The grievous mistake committed by Nuhu Ribadu was his refusal to reason with members of the last legislative arm during the administration of President Olusegun Obasanjo who had intended to amend the act establishing EFCC to make it more autonomous like other constitutional bodies whose membership tenures are guaranteed such that members cannot be removed or redeployed without the consent of majority of the legislators. In fact even the federal civil service commission has no power to sanction, appoint or promote staffs of such bodies. Example can be cited of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC). As it is presently constituted, the law does not confer the EFCC with such autonomy and independence.

    Surprisingly too much emotion and sentiments have been poured on the redeployment instead of addressing the basics. The nomination of Ribadu for the course is befitting of his status. The National Institute of Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS) is the highest leadership training institute for top functionaries in public and private sectors in Nigeria. It is not for nothing that the institute is often referred to as Mafia Nigeria Incorporated (MNI) instead of its official acronym for Member National Institute. It has served as a training ground for most top ranking leaders who later became Presidents, ministers, governors, chief executives of corporate organizations, chiefs in security and public service etc. Its serene environment is tonic for the kind of strenuous but strategic studies undertaken and yet it has a component for local and foreign tours for participants to understudy other environments in providing practical solutions to our myriad of problems.

    We must remember that most of the victors and losers of the 2007 Elections have their fates sealed by Nuhu Ribadu’s EFCC when it cleared or indicted them through a report of investigation. Surprisingly some indicted public figures, who were presumed as corrupt were alleged to have funded victories of the cleared candidates. These are some of the moral questions. Politics is a dirty game. But I wonder: Isn’t it reasonable to expect relief in whatever way for financiers who induced the system to influence the electoral process after they might have entered into agreement for soft landing? Some say NO POLITICIAN is EVER CLEAN. We know that big corporations all over the world fund and install governments to protect their interests.

    I want the next stages of EFCC to be mindful of our reality and peculiarity. It should consider treading softly on our indigenous entrepreneurs whose investments have provided legitimate employments to our youths and provide social service to our society. Like I always say, where we to be forced to choose between two evils, we can only settle for a lesser one. For instance if Otunba Mike Adenuga of Globalcom, has a case to answer in corporate competitive scheming, we must consider the fact that he has successfully broken the monopoly of foreign communication operators with affordable and quality service; his firms also provide thousands of jobs and engage in massive corporate social responsibility than other similar organizations. I should not be misunderstood here, just being frank and expressing a belief that most organizations engage in hanky-panky to win patronages. We need to support and encourage ours with all incentives and reliefs in the business world without harassment and intimidation.

    We only hope if another dogged fighter like Prof. Dora Akunyili of NAFDAC is nominated for similar a programme or assigned a greater role, we won’t interpret it to mean that the government wants to flood the market with fake drugs to exterminate the entire citizens. There is nothing more dignifying than leaving the stage when the ovation is loudest. Failures of most leaders result from attempts to overstay their usefulness. The contributions of those, whose tenures were shortened, even in controversial circumstances, still linger in memory years after they had left. I remember Murtala Muhammad and Muhammad Buhari/ Tunde Idiagbon administration. I believe Nuhu Ribadu can still play a greater role in future. Since Mallam Nuhu Ribadu himself has admitted he has nothing against the redeployment for studies and that the government did that in national interest, may I therefore call on spin doctors to sheathe their swords now that the position is clear?

    This article was originally published in Leadership January 11, Daily Champion January 13, Thisday on Sunday January 13, Sunday Tribune January 13, Daily Sun January 14, Daily Trust January 15, Vanguard January 16-17, New Nigerian January 16, 2008

  • Open Letter to Minister of Information on Nigeria’s Image

    John Odey Minister of Information and Communication
    Hon. John Odey, I find it necessary as a Nigerian writer with a bias in public relations to share with you pertinent issues on Nigeria’s Image Project. I use this media platform because of its importance to you as the top public officer in charge of information management in the country. Open letter like this convey the importance of the message instead of the usual direct memo which could be lost in a morass of bureaucratic redtapism or appear inconsequential in the heap of mails requiring the attention of ever busy public officers. I am also of the conviction that recent courageous decisions of government are clear pointers that the policy makers read newspapers and study other media sources, unlike their predecessors.

    I am aware of your background in banking and your last assignment as the spokesperson of one of the political parties in Nigeria. It is not necessary to mention the name of the party because of the feeling it may evoke in the minds of some people. But I must admit that you performed satisfactorily though, cautiously, within the dictate of that environment. It is gratifying to note too that since your appointment as minister, you have discharged your responsibility professionally and in a civilized manner. You have neither made controversial pronouncements nor defended indefensible acts.

    You may not be in any of the so-called JUICY ministries, even though communication is added to your portfolio, you are in the most sensitive organ of government that projects the image of our nation. Your ministry is the central mirror that the internal and external publics look at to assess the health and stability of our nation.

    Hon. Minister sir, since you are yet to announce publicly, as other ministers have done, your road map and agenda on information policy and its direction, my points in this memo may be helpful in formulating your marshal plan.

    Let’s start from the ministry’s headquarters. You may be surprised to learn that staff of the ministry prefer to be posted out than to remain in the headquarters. If there could be a Ministry-of-Do-Nothing, many would not mind to be there than stay in the Ministry of Information. The reason is not far fetched. Some staff presently have not received their salaries for months due to the introduction of online payment process called IPPIS. Yet some are ill-motivated without tangible schedules of responsibilities. As it happens in some establishments there is a problem of excessive interference from political appointees and consultants in running the core civil service routines. Add to these predicaments is occasional pressure for postings without regard to professional competence in terms of qualifications and experience. Because of the conservative thinking of average civil servants too, there is this self-inflicted malaise resulting from their failure to acquaint themselves adequately with the latest professional thinking and in the application of modern technology for information management.

    One of the missions of the ministry is to conduct research, surveys and studies to enhance better understanding of the relevance, impact and approach to public information and their implications for public policies and programmes. The problem in this cardinal responsibility is that of ill-trained staff and lack of logistics to execute some of the projects. A situation where there is no mobility for staff to cover outside assignment and/or conduct regular survey research on the impact of government policies needs to be urgently addressed. Past experiences have shown that some projects with outrageous expenditures made less if not negative impact as they lacked economic sense for overall national interest. To block such loopholes, the budget of the ministry should be prioritized and tied to tangible and result oriented programmes, which should also have the capacity to carry the staff along.

    As the official public information outfit responsible for gathering, processing, packaging essential information, the platforms for displaying and distribution of the packaged services should go beyond its existing webportal and services of its agencies in the electronic media like FRCN, NTA, VON and NAN to include rich publications and well-researched journals with timely frequency of delivery. This is necessary because the ministry has a statutory responsibility to provide general printing and publishing services to all ministries for effective public administration, education and business. Apart from its glossy Nigeria Monthly magazine and elitist Tender Journal for contract-seekers, other publications under its stables are not so regular. There is a fear that the Tenders Journal may soon be taking over with the establishment of the Bureau for Public Procurement unless that agency realizes that the ministry is responsible for printing such materials. The installation of modern and latest printing machine by ministry of information is necessary for general printing of newsletters, journals, magazines, cards, calendars and other seasonal printing for ministries and agencies. The idea of public-private-partnership should not be at the detriment of government’s responsibilities in job creation and cost effectiveness of services.

    Since the vision of the ministry is to create an informed and properly oriented citizenry; the people in a democratic setting must be involved in policy-making through effective and accurate information. So far your office seems to be enjoying a healthy and rosy bond with the press, a relationship usually associated with new governments. It is also gratifying to note that the administration of President YarAdua is disposed to public discourse, dialogue and consultation as it gauges the public tempo in addressing the teething problems bedeviling our nation. May I therefore suggest that you should sustain the tempo by engaging the members of the Fourth Estate of the Realm to partner with you in constructive engagements for the sake of participatory democracy and sustainable development of our dear nation.

    The functions of the ministry should go beyond just information management to other strategic aspects of public relations principles: reputation management, issues management, conflict resolution and tactical lobbying at home and abroad. It can partner with relevant professional bodies like Nigeria Institute of Public Relations (NIPR) Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), Nigerian Guild of Editors and APCON in its attempt to develop and institutionalize appropriate and generally acceptable public information and communication policies which will promote our cultural values, investment climate and uniqueness of our people in a prosperous and united nation. In fact the NIPR needs all the support to strengthen its legislation to effectively oversee actions and inaction of information practitioners towards ensuring the existence and maintenance of civilized and orderly and ethical behaviours in consistent with acceptable cultural and conventional norms.

    The Ministry’s Heart of Africa Project introduced by the last administration to promote Nigeria’s national brand assets and businesses needs modifications for strategic effect. As good as the project is towards promoting economic advancement and enhancing the international perception of Nigeria, it requires inward approach by engaging Nigerians and local media to focus on encouraging developmental issues which could influence the external media by which their audiences will receive the right information on the positive growth. That process is possible if the government addresses the teething problem bedeviling the nation like the cases of insecurity, poverty level, power generation and illiteracy, which can be tackled with vigorous pursuit of the Yar’Adua’s Seven Point Agenda.

    Our nation’s new positive international profile resulting from development at home is an indication that we are moving in the right direction. The forthcoming first Global Communication Summit being packaged by Timex Communication Limited would further enhance and promote the country’s image going by the caliber of respected international PR and communication experts billed to attend. With the recent nomination of ambassadors to foreign missions, it is high time that the government reopened some of its strategic Foreign Information Centres, which were closed down in the past because of shortage of funds. Some have argued that with surplus funds in Excess Crude and Foreign Reserve Accounts, redeploying Information Attaches to our missions, as conventional with other nations, can made economic in international image building.

    Hon. Minister Sir, it is necessary to reiterate that the Freedom of Information Bill is very dear to majority of Nigerians more especially your constituency, the press. It is therefore incumbent upon you, not to shy away from your responsibility to influence the re-presentation of the Bill to the National Assembly to strengthen press freedom, engender transparency and accountability in governance.

    I think the right steps and actions taken by the government in the areas of popular policies and its desired commitment to the rule of law, is drawing the public attention away from perceived faulty electoral process that allegedly brought in the new administration. Your task is eased, as all that is required of you is to look inward and take the best initiatives to make a difference in the information management and be amongst the best of the ministers of information we have had since our Independence in 1960.

    Please accept my best wishes as you combine information and communication (juicy?) in your schedule of duties.
    This article by Yushau A. Shuaib was originally published in The Guardian October 1, New Nigerian October 2, Daily Triumph October 3, Vanguard October 3-4, The Punch October 4, Leadership October 4, Weekly Trust October 6 and Daily Sun October 23, 2007